Assad Speech – December 6, 2012

President Bashar al-Assad’s speech in Arabic – Sunday January 6, 2013

Many people are saying that Bashar is in a bubble. By this they are insisting that his victory speech is bluster or based on bad intelligence and fawning officers who give him only good news. Certainly, he is in a bubble. But it is a mistake to overestimate the power of the rebels. They too have been in a bubble. They have thought that this was going to be much easier from the beginning – that Bashar would either roll over because he would not have the stomach for a real fight, or the international community would do a Libya, or that Syria would have a Tahrir moment.

The opposition has gotten stronger every month since the beginning of the uprising. But the destructive power of this regime has not played itself out by a long shot. It is responding to the changes on the ground and becoming more lethal as well. Patrick Seale in the Aljazeera show, copied below, argues that Syria could turn out to be like Algeria – with 200,000 killed and no rebel victory. I don’t believe Syria will end up like Algeria. I don’t believe that Bashar or his military can endure, precisely because of the emerging sectarian nature of this fight. But I also believe that Patrick is right to warn the international community and Syrians that worse may yet be waiting for them. The regime’s military remains powerful and has many weapons the opposition cannot match. They are killing the opposition in high numbers. Most opposition commanders have no or little military experience. They have little outside support and what they do have is fickle and irregular. What this means is that they will take an extraordinary beating before becoming a professional fighting force with the ability to destroy the Syrian Army and take Damascus and Syria’s other cities.

But in the end, the numbers are likely to be decisive. The regime does not have an infinite supply of supporters who can fight. The rebels probably do. But what will Syria look like when it is over? The thought is staggering.

Video: What does 2013 have in store for Syria? – Video
Seale, Bahout and Tabler on al-jazeera, on January 6, 2013

President Bashar al-Assad’s Speech Highlights video (English Subtitles)

 Excerpts from Syrian President Assad’s speech – text-Reuters

Russia’s reporting on the Speech – RT – “President Assad outlines political solution to Syrian conflict”

English transcript from Sana
President al-Assad : Out of Womb of Pain, Hope Should Be Begotten, from Suffering Important Solutions Rise
Jan 06, 2013

DAMASCUS, (SANA)_ President Bashar al-Assad on Sunday said if pain is pervading like a dark cloud over the country, the emotional state only, with its sublimity, is not enough to compensate the loss of the loved ones or the restoration of security and peace to the country or providing bread, water, fuel and medicine nationwide.

Delivering a speech on the latest developments in Syria and the region at the Opera House in Damascus, President al-Assad added “out of the womb of pain, hope should be begotten and from the bottom of suffering the most important solutions rise, as the dark cloud in the sky conceals the sun light, but it also carries in its layers rain, purity and hope of welfare and giving.”

President al-Assad said “These feelings of agony, sadness, challenge and intention are huge energy that will not get Syria out of its crisis unless it turns this energy into a comprehensive national move that saves the homeland from the unprecedented campaign hatched against it.”

“This national move is the only balm for the deep wounds which affected our society and were about to divide it as it is the only way that is able to keep Syria geographically and making it politically stronger,” the President added.

“At the beginning they wanted it a fake revolution but the Syrian people rebelled against them, then they tried to impose it by money, media and arms secretly and when they failed, they moved to the second phase through dropping the masks of a “peaceful revolution” and unveiled the cover of the weapons they were using secretly to use them openly starting their attempts to occupy cities as to pounce upon other cities,” President al-Assad said, adding that “their brutal behaviors didn’t deter our people, thanks to their awareness and steadfastness, to unveil their lies and reject them. Therefore they decided to take revenge on the people through spreading terrorism everywhere.”

The President stressed that the Takfiries were working at the back rows through bombings mass killing leaving the armed gangs at the front line but the unity of the Syrian people and army obliged them to move for fighting at the front lines where they led the rudder of the blood, killing and mutilation ship.

“Each citizen is responsible and able to provide something even if it is tiny or limited as he/she may consider, because the homeland is for everyone; we all defend it each with his/her capacity and capability, because the thought is a way of defense, the stance is a way of defense, construction is a way of defense and protecting people’s properties is a way of defense,” President al-Assad added.

“Since the attack is launched against the homeland with all its human and material components, the mindful citizen has certainly known that passivity, waiting for time or others to solve the problem is a sort of pushing the country towards the abyss, and not participating in solutions is a kind of taking the homeland backwards with no progress towards overcoming what the home is going through.

“They have killed civilians and the innocent to kill light and brightness in our country; they have assassinated the qualified and intellectuals to spread their ignorance on our minds; they sabotaged the infrastructure built with the people’s money to make suffering pervade into our lives; they deprived children of their schools to devastate the future of the country and express their ignorance and they cut off electricity, communications and fuel supply, leaving the elderly and children suffering from the cold weather without medicine, emphasizing their savagery. But their theft has been manifested through sabotaging wheat stocks, stealing wheat and flour to make the loaf like a dream for citizens and to starve people… Is it a conflict for power and post or is it a conflict between the homeland and its enemies? Is it a struggle for authority or is it a revenge on the Syrian people who did not give those terrorist killers the key word for dismembering Syria and its society…. continue

Syria’s Bashar al-Assad calls on foreign countries to end support for rebels
Opposition denounces president’s peace plan as ‘empty rhetoric’ as Assad pledges to stay and continue fighting ‘terrorist’ violence
Ian Black, Middle East editor

State Dept: Asad’s Speech
2013-01-06
Asad’s Speech Press Statement Victoria Nuland Department Spokesperson, Office of the Spokesperson Washington, DC January 6, 2013

Bashar al-Asad’s speech today is yet another attempt by the regime to cling to power and does nothing to advance the Syrian people’s goal of a political transition. His initiative is detached from reality, undermines the efforts of Joint Special Representative Lakhdar Brahimi, and would only allow the regime to further perpetuate its bloody oppression of the Syrian people.

For nearly two years, the Asad regime has brutalized its own people. Even today, as Asad speaks of dialogue, the regime is deliberately stoking sectarian tensions and continuing to kill its own people by attacking Sunni towns and villages in the mixed areas of Jabal Akrad and Jabal Turkmen in Lattakia province.

Asad has lost all legitimacy and must step aside to enable a political solution and a democratic transition that meets the aspirations of the Syrian people. The United States continues to support the Geneva Action Group’s framework for a political solution, which was endorsed by the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, the Arab League, and the UN General Assembly. We will continue our efforts in support of Joint Special Representative Brahimi to build international unity behind it and to urge all parties in Syria to take meaningful steps toward its implementation

Bashar al-Assad’s speech echoes Gaddafi’s final, desperate rallies
There was more than a little of the Gaddafi about Bashar al-Assad’s appearance on Sunday, and not just the theatre of a personality cult.
By , Middle East Correspondent

It was the first time in two years of revolution we have seen support for the Syrian leader so choreographed, accompanied by such fist-pumping chants from the audience.

Even the slogans were the same as the slain Libyan dictator: “God, Syria, Bashar, enough”.

Reminiscent too was the rambling delivery, leaping incoherently back and forth between vague peace proposals and unremitting imprecations against the opposition: “al-Qaeda”, “armed criminals”, “foreign terrorists” were also prominent in Col Muammar Gaddafi’s vocabulary.

Then there were the lapses into bizarre sentimentality, as when he announced: “I look at the eyes of Syria’s children and I don’t see any happiness” – something that would hardly surprise anyone who had watched the news over the last two years.

Mr Assad is no Gaddafi, of course. But his smoother, better-educated, more rational persona, lacking the Gaddafi instinct for the absurd, makes him in some ways even more of a mystery.

 Tabler on NPR - Assad in Bubble

Comments (367)


Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] Show All

351. MarigoldRan said:

Revenire, similar to the regime he supports, is idiotically evil. Like attracts like.

It’s the worst combination of traits.

@ Zoo

I’m glad you’ve gotten used to it. That means others can kick you more, something I’m sure you’ve had ample experience with. You’d think you’d learn after a while, but apparently you don’t.

Similarly to the regime, you’re stubbornly stupid. As I’ve said: “Like attracts like.”

Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4

January 8th, 2013, 11:08 pm

 

352. revenire said:

Marigoldran are you high? You support TERRORISM and are calling others evil? LOL

Thumb up 4 Thumb down 4

January 8th, 2013, 11:23 pm

 

353. zoo said:

346. MarigoldRan said:

“You’re stubbornly stupid”

I return the compliment

Thumb up 4 Thumb down 3

January 8th, 2013, 11:25 pm

 

354. MarigoldRan said:

I am against terrorism, be it by government or non-government organization.

Just because a group of people call themselves the government doesn’t give them the right to bomb and terrorize the country.

@ Zoo

Sure, why not. Like you, I’m also not upset: but the reason is different. Unlike you I haven’t been insulted by many people on this blog, so being insulted is a novel experience.

But since it’s coming from you, it means nothing.

Thumb up 3 Thumb down 5

January 8th, 2013, 11:26 pm

 

355. zoo said:

Reve

With supporters like that specimen , no wonder the revolution is a disaster..

Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3

January 8th, 2013, 11:27 pm

 

356. MarigoldRan said:

To repeat and to return to the topic of Syria:

I am against terrorism, be it by government or non-government organization.

Just because a group of people call themselves the government doesn’t give them the right to bomb and terrorize the country.

Are you willing to make a counter-argument to that? Or do you wish to trade insults until I go to work and I have to stop posting comments online?

Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4

January 8th, 2013, 11:29 pm

 

357. revenire said:

If you are against terrorism denounce the FSA (they said they were all al-Nusra remember?). Prove it Marigoldran.

Are you FOR beheadings like you are FOR theft and robbery? I think you are.

You “revolution” freaks are really something else.

Thumb up 5 Thumb down 5

January 8th, 2013, 11:43 pm

 

358. MarigoldRan said:

The FSA is better than the Syrian regime. It has committed FEWER atrocities than the regime, which is why I support it. Once the FSA has evened the atrocities count (what goes around, comes around… remember?) then I’ll become neutral again.

As I’ve said before, just because a group of people call themselves the government, it doesn’t give them the right to bomb or terrorize the population. Once you see it this way, there is NO excuse for the regime’s actions.

The FSA may not be good, but the regime is most definitely evil.

Thumb up 5 Thumb down 6

January 8th, 2013, 11:52 pm

 

359. MarigoldRan said:

Once you see this war as a bunch of groups fighting for control of what was formerly known as Syria, everything becomes clearer. Syria HAS no legitimate government. Therefore, the stuff that the regime is doing IS terrorism. Some of the other posters like Gh, for example, holds that view, which I respect, though I do not always agree with him.

The only people that continue to hold the view that Syria is a nation are regime propagandists. They use it as an excuse for their governments’ actions. (“We’re bombing Sunni villages because they harbor “terrorists” who are attacking the country. Etc. etc. )

EDIT: Once you strip that veneer of nationalism away, there is NO excuse for the regime’s actions. It is evil.

Thumb up 5 Thumb down 6

January 8th, 2013, 11:57 pm

 

360. MarigoldRan said:

Any counter-arguments? Or does my position stand?

Or would you like to engage in another bout of insults?

Thumb up 3 Thumb down 5

January 9th, 2013, 12:08 am

 

361. revenire said:

Of course Syria is a nation. It has been a nation for thousands of years.

Thumb up 4 Thumb down 5

January 9th, 2013, 12:22 am

 

362. Roland said:

It won’t be like Algeria–at least not in terms of outcome.

In the ’90′s the FLN received aid, advisors, equipment, and loans from many Western countries, while never being made subject to trade or financial sanctions. That gave the “pouvoir” in Algeria the wherewithal to defy the FIS (which had won by a massive landslide in the elections).

However, in terms of human and material cost, the civil war in Syria may exceed that of Algeria.

Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

January 9th, 2013, 12:24 am

 

363. MarigoldRan said:

@ Revenire

The land has been there for thousands of years, but the nation has not. It was part of the Ottoman Empire for hundreds of years before that Empire broke apart. It was replaced by a fragmented group of countries, one of which was Syria.

A bunch of stupid Europeans got together at the end of WWI and said, “well, this piece of land is now considered Syria.” They knew absolutely nothing about the land or the people living there. Why else would they clump Alawites with Sunnis with Kurds in the same country given their propensities for killing one another?

The modern Syrian nation wasn’t born until Hafez Assad united it in the 1960s. We’re seeing today how that experiment has turned out.

But you’re a troll, so you don’t really care. But then again, perhaps you do. Why else would you be trolling on this blog as opposed to some other blog?

EDIT: I was hoping for the Lebanese solution, but it looks increasingly like the Afghanistan solution. At the rate things are going, they should put up road signs at the border of Syria that says:

“Welcome to the new Afghanistan of the Middle East.”

Thumb up 3 Thumb down 5

January 9th, 2013, 12:28 am

 

364. revenire said:

Nah, Syria is a nation. You’re thinking of British-created states like Qatar maybe.

The people there are not Sunni or Alawite etc. first but Syrian first. That is why the SAA is so cohesive. You know how many families married Sunni-Alawite etc. It is all mixed.

Thumb up 5 Thumb down 4

January 9th, 2013, 12:49 am

 

365. Syrialover said:

New post up

Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2

January 9th, 2013, 2:59 am

 

366. No one has the last word on Syria « In These New Times said:

[...] Faisal’s remarks take added meaning when we factor in that in the ‘rare speech’ by Bashar later in the weekend in Damascus, he didn’t criticize Saudi Arabia for arming and funding the Syrian rebels although [...]

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

January 10th, 2013, 1:09 pm

 

367. SYRIAN HAMSTER said:

For sure, Revenire is an idiot, but those who believe him are merely imbeciles.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

January 11th, 2013, 4:31 am

 

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] Show All

Post a comment


6 − = two