“Getting Down to Business,” by Andrew Tabler

Andrew Tabler has an excellent op-ed in the Herald Tribune, explaining why dialogue and doing business with Syria will be more affective for what ails the US in the region than bombs and sanctions.
Friday, September 14, 2007

DAMASCUS: Relations between the Syrian government and Americans who work with Syrians here are as bad as I have seen in the four years since I began working as the American editor of Syria Today, the country's first private-sector English language magazine.

Last November, the Syrian authorities closed the Damascus offices of Amideast, an American nongovernmental organization that seeks to promote understanding and cooperation between Americans and the people of the Middle East. Syrian coordination with the Fulbright program has petered out as well. Residency permits, normally rubber-stamped long in advance for teachers at the local American School, were approved after intense diplomacy only days before classes started this autumn. Americans are still studying in Syria's excellent Arabic-language institutes, but their visa applications are being scrutinized more closely than at any time since 2000, when I first began coming here.

These disruptions – the direct result of Washington's schizophrenic Syria policy – are blocking the best path to rapprochement between the two countries, the development of economic ties in the private sector.

On the one hand, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is following the recommendations of the Baker-Hamilton commission by "engaging" Syria on "Iraq only." Damascus, sensing its isolation is over, wants its concerns with Lebanon, Israel and the Palestinians on the table as well.

On the other hand, the "Syria Democracy Project" of the State Department's Middle East Partnership Initiative is financing exiled Syrian dissidents bent on overthrowing the Assad regime – which increasingly views American activities in Syria as a Trojan horse for "regime change." The resulting diplomatic dialogue of the deaf has yet to produce any tangible results.

The isolation and engagement camps agree that "dealing" with Syria politically, albeit in distinctly different ways, is key to containing spiraling violence in Iraq, to ending political turmoil in Lebanon and to making peace between Israelis and Palestinians.

Both arguments make strong points. But the policy that is likely to work in the long run will be that which bolsters America's waning leverage in Syria today by engaging its booming private sector.

Diplomatic pressures on Damascus following accusations of its involvement in the assassination of the former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in February 2005 spurred a number of economic crises in Syria that led Damascus to implement long-delayed plans to loosen its 44-year socialist grip on the economy. Be it in finance, trade, or foreign exchange, everywhere the lethargic public sector gives way, the private sector blooms – a testament to the trade and entrepreneurial base of Syria's secular society and culture. The International Monetary Fund has estimated that non-oil economic growth in Syria in 2006 will hit a record 7 percent.

Getting involved in this boom makes sense for two reasons. First, it's an arena where America can compete with spreading Iranian influence in the Arab World. As the media focused on Iranian-financed arms shipments to Syria over the last year, Iran invested $400 million in Syria, equal to 66 percent of Arab and half of all non-Arab investment in the country. Earlier this year, Iran helped Syria open its first automobile assembly plant.

Many Syria watchers belittled announcements of Iranian joint ventures in refining, transportation, chemicals and food processing as mere "paper projects." But if only half break ground by the time a new American president takes office in January 2009, Tehran's influence will be that much harder to uproot later as part of any U.S. attempt to "wedge" Syria from Iran or secure a Syrian-Israeli peace deal.

Second, embracing Syria's private sector would help reverse America's rapidly declining reputation in the Arab world by engaging through our shared trade and entrepreneurial traditions. Many Syrians are repulsed by sectarian chaos in Iraq and resent Washington's tacit support for Israel's strikes on civilian areas in Lebanon during the war last summer. But they still admire and respect America's business prowess.

Given the rapid pace of globalization, and with it Syria's options to develop trading partnerships with China, Iran and elsewhere, America's "soft-power" advantage will not last long.

The irony here is that the biggest hurdle to Americans engaging Syria's private sector hasn't been the Assad regime, but failed U.S. trade sanctions on Syria. Last year, official U.S.-exports to Syria actually increased by 30 percent, which combined with rampant smuggling from Lebanon and Dubai, means that the Syrian market is full of American goods. But American companies refrain from sending trainers and consultants to talk about the ideas and values behind their products for fear of crossing some line in the fog of Washington's Syria policy. American investors face the same obstacles as well.

For sure, if Washington re-calibrated or lifted trade sanctions on Syria, the Assad regime would dub it a "victory." But this would allow America to invest in shared ties that will lead to greater influence in Syria, undermine Damascus' hard-liners who cite sanctions to justify curbing American programs in Syria, and, perhaps most importantly, prove that America doesn't have a beef with the Syrian people – and never did.

Andrew Tabler is editor-in-chief of Syria Today and an outgoing fellow of the Institute of Current World Affairs. He is author of "The High Road to Damascus: Engage Syria's Private Sector."

Comments (6)


1. mish said:

Who funds Andrew Tabler and Syria Today? It is quoted in NYT, and they are sure to only use US gov-certified/MSM apporved quotes in their rag. Is he paid for by NGO’s, USAID, Jewish foundations? I don’t diagree wth his article but would like a bit of disclosure.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

September 15th, 2007, 7:02 pm

 

2. Joshua said:

Syria Today is a good magazine. Nothing louche about it. It was begun by Kinda Kanbar, a charming and smart woman from the Houran. Tabler has been there from the beginning, giving it solid quality, guidance, and reporting. He had been reporting in Egypt before coming to Syria.

It is the first English language magazine in Syria. It has a licence to operate in Syria’s free trade zone. It pays about $200 an article and has a good staff of young reporters. Many English speaking graduates in Syria to learn Arabic try to write for it.

The “Forward,” owned by Abdulsalam Haykal and edited by Sami Moubayed, was begun last year as a competitor. It does not pay for articles yet, but is about to create a web presence. They are both good. It is testament to Syria’s growing market and openness that two English language magazines have been started.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

September 15th, 2007, 8:43 pm

 

3. Jamal said:

Now here’s a good read!

Two items from The Sunday Times (UK) September 16, 2007

ISRAELIS ‘BLEW APART SYRIAN NUCLEAR CACHE’ (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article2461421.ece)

and

A TALE OF TWO DICTATORSHIPS: THE LINKS BETWEEN NORTH KOREA AND SYRIA (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article2452356.ece)

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

September 15th, 2007, 11:54 pm

 

4. why-discuss said:

It looks like Iran is growing its business in Syria!

The acting industries and mines minister announced in Tehran on Friday…that the sides are currently cooperating in 16 projects valued at some $1 billion, predicting that the figure will reach $10 billion by 2012.

Iran to invest $10b in Syria by 2012

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

September 16th, 2007, 2:33 am

 

5. Charlie Brown said:

Yeah, but who funds it……..?
We all have an idea though.

Its a horribly written and ghastly looking piece of rag.
No-one here in Syria buys it and surely not outside the country either.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

September 16th, 2007, 10:04 am

 

6. Milli Schmidt said:

Having written for Syria Today myself I wouldn’t call it “ghastly”, although the writing and lay-out could be a lot better. It still carries a lot of information about all kinds of parts of Syrian society that one wouldn’t find elsewhere.

On the funding: while I was there, I never got a straight answer. Apparently most of the funding comes from an English bloke…not more was to be gleaned. It’s also itneresting that it continues business although it must be haemorrhaging money – although fair to say that budget pressures were always a big topic during my time.

I find Tabler’s op-ed naive, with regards to the business opportunities that Syria would afford American investors. Syria’s economy, especially the “modern” bits, are run as a patronage system and it’s naive to think that US investors could just walk in and start doing business in this extremely intransparent environment. Needless to say that even apart from that hurdle, Syria’s economy remains a very volatile and risky environment.

I’m soooo curious as to where this stock market adventure will lead!!

S

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

September 17th, 2007, 8:57 am

 

Post a comment