Ray Close on the Golan

Golan

Golan

Current Israeli leadership Doesn’t Seriously Consider Returning Golan, Writes Ray Close in an email.

I was the CIA Station Chief in Saudi Arabia from 1970 to 1977. During the height of intensive shuttle diplomacy following the Yom Kippur War, Henry Kissinger made one of his frequent visits to Riyadh to brief King Faisal. While he and the King were conferring at the Royal Palace, a small group of us met for dinner at the home of a senior Saudi royal counselor. Among the eight persons present were two of the king’s sons, Prince Saud al Faisal (Princeton ’64, now Foreign Minister) and Prince Turki al Faisal (recently Saudi ambassador in Washington, and once a freshman member of the Princeton class of ’67 before transfering to Georgetown University). The only other American present beside myself (Princeton ’51) was Harold (“Hal”) Saunders (Princeton ’52), at that time the senior advisor on Middle East Affairs attached to the NSC. (Hal later succeeded Joe Sisco as Assistant Secretary of State for NEA, and now heads the Kettering Foundation.)

After dinner, Hal Saunders produced a largescale map of the Golan Heights, and invited us all to gather around him as he unfolded it on top of a grand piano. Hal started by explaining the latest Israeli proposal for the location of the ceasefire line that was to separate Israeli and Syrian forces. It had been prominently delineated on the map in a broad green felt-tip pen, as I clearly remember. After Hal explained that the line had been drawn personally by Moshe Dayan, he pointed out the location of various Jewish settlements that had been established after the Six-Day War in June, 1967, which the Israelis insisted would have to be on their side of the new ceasefire line dividing the Golan Heights.

Hal then told us of an exchange between Henry Kissinger and Golda Meir that had taken place that same morning over breakfast at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. Henry had said to the Israeli Prime Minister: “Golda, it’s those damn settlements that are causing us all the trouble”. To this, Mrs. Meir had responded: “Henry, why do you think we put them there?”

It was not a jest.

I think that anecdote confirms that there have been times when the Israeli Government deliberately encouraged Israeli civilians to take physical possession of critically important geographic locations simply to create valuable bargaining chips for future use in a larger strategic politico-military game. I can think of no other plausible explanation for such cynical dismissal of courageous and dedicated pioneers.

I wonder how many of the 25,000 settlers living on the Golan today realize that 35 years ago the much-revered Golda Meir once ruthlessly characterized their forerunners as nameless pawns? However, I also wonder how any realistic person today can possibly believe that the current political leadership of the State of Israel is sincere when they hint that they might consider returning the Golan Heights to Syria as part of a negotiated peace bargain.

Comments (4)


1. GPC said:

Farid Ghadri’s dog trainer, David Wurmser is still finding something to say on fox tv. The unraveling of the so called Syrian opposition should not be seen as anything of worth, lest you give importance to the khaddams and ghadris of the world (we still have one ghadri to contend with in beirut, and i hear he is losing his police protection as a star witness & solicitor in the hariri assassination) …
The deflation of the anti-syria/anti-resistance camp was not quick enough

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

April 10th, 2009, 11:26 pm

 

2. Alex said:

“I also wonder how any realistic person today can possibly believe that the current political leadership of the State of Israel is sincere when they hint that they might consider returning the Golan Heights to Syria as part of a negotiated peace bargain.”

Ray, the good news is that the current leadership is not even hinting they will return the Golan.

We’ll just have to wait a bit more … no rush.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

April 11th, 2009, 8:39 am

 

3. Shai said:

One of the first settlers on the Golan, Dr. Yigal Kipnis, confirms Ray’s message about the original purpose of the settlements – to serve as negotiation cards if peace would ever become a subject of discussion. Yossi and I were supposed to meet Dr. Kipnis on the Golan during our visit, but in the end it didn’t work out. We’ll interview him via email/phone in the coming weeks.

Although Dr. Kipnis still lives on the Golan, he is one of the first to have announced his readiness to leave, as part of a peace agreement with Syria. In fact, out of recognition (and perhaps agreement) with the very purpose of the settlements, he remains there for precisely that reason. We hope to learn more about his views soon.

Alex, I agree with you, we (all) need to wait a while longer. With your “other President” (Ghadry) now gone, Bibi will have no choice but to speak to Bashar. If he doesn’t, Ray’s map might be carried by Mitchell and Clinton from now on, on every visit to the region. It is only a matter of time before Bibi will realize Israel has no choice. The settlements, and the Golan, were never meant to be ours. And, unfortunately and fortunately, they won’t be.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

April 11th, 2009, 11:45 am

 

4. Akbar Palace said:

Alex, Shai,

I agree. I would wait a bit longer. I’m sure, in time, Bashar will “loosen up”.

GPC,

Thanks for the “heads-up”. I found the comments:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/04/10/bush-aides-warn-obama-russias-pledge-iran-nuclear-issue/

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

April 11th, 2009, 3:01 pm

 

Post a comment