“Syria and the Peace Process” by Landis

"Lots of blood was left on the floor" following debates in Washington over whether Syria should be invited to the Maryland Peace Negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians. That was how a Washington insider described the heated Washington battle over Syrian participation in the peace process to me while I was in NYC.

This battle between neocons (Cheney's people) and realists (the State Dept.), which has been raging ever since Washington placed Syria in diplomatic quarantine, was won by the realists. Syria is being invited to Maryland.

The big question is under what terms. Will Syria find the invitation interesting enough to say, "Yes?"

So far Syria is keeping its cards very close to its chest as it explores exactly what the invitation means. At first Syrian officials said that they would not accept an invitation to participate in the negotiations if Syria was merely going to be used for a photo opportunity to legitimize the humiliation of the Palestinians and sidelining of Hamas. Syria fears that it will be giving away its Hamas card for nothing in return.

Also, Syria is very mistrustful of the Bush administration. It has learned this mistrust the hard way. In May 2007, Walid Muallem was invited to Sharm al-Shaykh to talk with Secretary Rice. She assured Syria that relations could get back on track if Syria helped with Palestine and other things. Syria played a positive role in Palestine, helping to broker the Hamas-PLO government with Saudi. A week after the Sharm al-Shaykh meeting, President Bush renewed sanctions on Syria and added more. Rice was made to look like a donkey by the neocons who undermined State's entire policy. Bashar learned not to trust the realists. 

The French and British have been sending high level envoys to get Bashar to make concessions in Lebanon and promising all sorts of goodies if he does. The problem is that Washington must deliver these goodies and few people believe that Washington policy is functional or that there is one boss in Washington. Factionalism has run wild. I have described the factionalism in cartoon style as being Cheney versus Rice, but it is more complicated and Byzantine. This is because everyone is getting into the foreign policy business right now as the Senate and House Foreign Policy hearings demonstrate.

"We want to keep the door open to Syria," is how the effort to get Syria invited was described to me. But why keep the door to Syria open? In order to fool Syria into playing nice while Washington and Israel reward the PLO in the West Bank for good behavior and punish Hamas? Is this a bate-and-switch exercise that Washington strategists are so good at? Or, is it the beginning of real negotiations between Israel and Syria? Is the US prepared to begin dropping sanctions on Syria and normalizing relations? Is it prepared to help Syria get back the Golan Heights? After all, the only basis for a permanent end to fighting along Israel's northern border is a return of the Golan. Anything short of the Golan will be a bandaid. It will only be a temporary fix to the Hizbullah problem and Syrian support for Palestinian proxies in its efforts to hurt Israel.

Most Syrians have long since come to terms with Israel's existence. They want peace and normalcy in the region. They are tired of war, emergency rule, and bad relations with the West. But they do want the Golan back. Any effort by the US or Israel to squeeze concessions from Syria without returning the Golan in full will only fail in the long term.

Syria must decide whether it wants to play Washington factional politics with no guarantees that President Bush is prepared to make the concessions that his policy makers promise. Syria is delving into murky waters at a time when Washington may not be a reliable partner in peace and the government may be too weak to deliver. This is ironic. "Lack of reliability" is usually the reason given by Washington not to engage with Middle Eastern partners.

[Here are a few news clips that have bearing on the analysis offered above.]

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has renewed his secret peace overtures to Syrian President Bashar Assad, telling him Israel is willing to return the captured Golan Heights if Damascus severs its ties with Iran and militant groups, the Yediot Ahronot newspaper reported on Tuesday.

Olmert hinted in a briefing to an influential parliamentary committee Monday that he was holding secret contacts with Syria. In response to a lawmaker's question on the subject, Olmert responded, "I don't have to tell you about everything that I do."

Yediot also said Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak has asked reserves Maj. Gen. Uri Saguy, a former chief of military intelligence, to review Israel's most sensitive intelligence reports and formulate recommendations for Barak about the prospect of renewing peace talks with Syria.

On Monday, Olmert told parliament's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that he was "ready for peace with Syria and prepared to conduct negotiations with no preconditions — on condition they (the Syrians) abandon the 'axis of evil' and don't support terror," according to participants in the meeting.

Olmert was replying to a question by lawmaker Ran Cohen on whether Olmert was talking to Syria. On Tuesday, Cohen said Olmert gave the clear impression contacts with Syria were already under way.

"This is his first hint that he is holding some sort of negotiations with Syria," Cohen said. "It was fairly clear to everyone sitting there that he is doing something and not saying anything about it."

Olmert added that the United States did not oppose the possibility of Israel's fully resuming talks with Damascus, Cohen said.

Barak reportedly does not believe Israel has a chance of reaching a peace deal with the Palestinians because he considers Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas too weak. (AP)

Barak for Syrian participation in Peace Talks

HERZLIYA, Israel, Nov. 13 (Xinhua) — Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said on Tuesday that Syria's participation in the upcoming U.S.-sponsored Mideast peace conference later this month could be a positive progress and lead to the renewal of peace talks.

Barak made the comments during an International Institute for Counter-Terrorism forum at the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya on Tuesday.

He, however, urged that Syria's attendance at the peace summit "needs to be based on the premise that the Syrians recognize the main topic for discussion is the Palestinian issue."

Syria has said it wouldn't attend the gathering in Annapolis, Maryland, unless the meeting would also discuss the issue of the Golan Heights, which was captured by Israel from Syria in 1967.

Syrian Assistant Secretary General of the Syrian Baath Party Abdullah al-Ahmar said on Monday that Damascus was still waiting to see if the conference's agendas include the issues of Palestinian territories as well as the Golan Heights and Shebaa Farms.

Senator Hagel on the Peace Process: (Nov. 8 at Center for Strategic and International Studies) 

To succeed, President Bush must become actively invested in the negotiations. In the Middle East, Hamas cannot be simply ignored like before. We must not pursue again a policy premised on an illusory hope that Hamas will collapse through isolation. Nor can Syria be excluded. Serious focus must be given to the "Israel-Syria" track, as part of any peace process.

Comments (60)

Pages: « 1 [2] Show All

51. fadal said:

the US peace conference will be like a temporary, but strong, anaesthetic for the PA to reduce their effectiveness when US and Israel attack Iran. this is history repeating itself before the war with Iraq. syria will go there with or without getting an individual invitation. let them get one first through the Arabs!!!

beleive it or not, the decision to attack Iran is taken and it is only a matter of time before we wake up one morning to the news.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

November 14th, 2007, 5:49 pm


52. AnotherIsraeliGuy said:

I whole-heartedely support what AP wrote and would like to add that I admire your courage. Standing up to tyrants is not easy.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

November 14th, 2007, 5:50 pm


53. abraham said:

I come back after two weeks and the same batch of people are arguing over the same things with the same misinformed perspectives and the same misguided ideologies.

Akrood Pal-ass linked to MEMRI *and* Daniel Pipes in one posting! If he’d only quoted from Bernard Lewis he’d have accomplished a trifecta!


The anti-Semitic Israeli zealots write the same libelous cannards against the Arabs, which receive the same responses they always do. Talk about the definition of insanity. It seems Israelstan breeds insane people. It’s just one big insane asylum of people who think the whole world is out to get them, and then they do terrible things to Palestinians to turn those delusional fears into self-fulfilling prophecy.

What ever happened to Syria’s nascent nuclear program that Israel bombed in a heroic and daring mission?


Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

November 14th, 2007, 6:10 pm


54. abraham said:

Peter H:

As much as I hate to say it, Akbar Palce does have a valid point.

I’m sorry, have you been here long? I’ve never seen him make a valid point.

As I see it, Palestinians and the rest of the Arab world have very little leverage over Israel. Israel can live quite prosperously with the status quo. It’s going to take some creative strategies to force Israel to end its occupation of Palestinians & Syrian land.

Yes, as long as I keep paying my taxes here in the U.S. My taxes are their prosperity. They are the world’s welfare queens.

The way I see it, I OWN Israel and everything they have. And I want my stuff back.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

November 14th, 2007, 6:15 pm


55. ausamaa said:

I say ;

It is our belief without a doubt that Syria will liberate the Golan by peace or by force.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

November 14th, 2007, 7:36 pm


56. ausamaa said:


So would the Lebanese and the Palestinians!

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

November 14th, 2007, 7:40 pm


57. IsraeliGuy said:


Flipping Syria may indeed mean different things to different people, however, let me tell you what it means to the vast majority of Israelis, without sugarcoating things or remaining vague.

It means that Syria totally switches sides, which also means that Syria will betray its current allies and will practically stab them in the back.

Now, you may feel that you have an alternative recipe, a one which benefits all sides – which includes NO major Syrian flipping, but just some minor flipping (or even none).

The ‘problem’ is that most Israelis will not agree to accept your recipe.
They have a recipe of their own regarding what’s good for them and what’s not.

We have a situation where the Golan is the ultimate holy grail of the Syrian leadership and people.
The parallel holy grail for Israelis is a 180 degrees Syrian flip (as I described above), which will lead to major geopolitical changes in our region.

If Israel won’t feel it got a good barter, according to its standards – not yours, there will be no deal.
The way I see it, Israel will never give the Golan to Syria for less than a full flip.
Holy grail for holy grail.

You may like it, you may hate it, you may suggest your own alternatives for a full flip, but just as Syria won’t have peace with Israel unless it will get the Golan, Israel will never give the Golan for nothing less than a full flip.

Ausamaa brought an interesting article from Haaretz.
If you’re asking me, here’s the most important piece from it:

“This potential was never translated into an agreement for various reasons, but the root cause was the failure of the Israeli leadership, in its various incarnations, to achieve internal agreement within Israel on a withdrawal from the Golan”.

You see, if most Israelis won’t tell themselves “Hey, this is a great deal and I’d be crazy to reject it” – there won’t be one, regardless of Halevy, Dichter or any other figure who advocates for a deal with Syria.

Breaking the glass ceiling of 35%-40% is extremely difficult.

Almost all of the non Jewish Israelis (Arabs, Druze, Christians, etc) will automatically vote for any peace deal between Israel and Syria – regardless of the actual terms and the specific details.

Then you have the Israeli Zionist left wing (Meretz party supporters).
They will also back ANY deal, anytime

This brings you to about 25%-30% of support – an automatic support that you can expect at any given time, regardless of current events, atmosphere, public mood, etc.

Then, you have SOME of the labor and Kadima parties supporters.
Yep, some of them will also back a deal and vote for it.

So getting 40% is doable, but getting over 40% is pretty difficult (although not impossible).
Getting 50% approval is extremely difficult (and perhaps impossible) but for this to happen, the Israelis will have to think that this is the deal of their lifetime.

If the Israelis won’t get their holy grail, they won’t give Syria’s one either.

Personally, I believe that Syria can’t flip the way the Israeli government(s) and the Israeli public expects it to.
Therefore, I believe that the odds that a deal will actually materialize during the Assad rule are extremely low.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

November 14th, 2007, 8:11 pm


58. Akbar Palace said:

Abraham retorts:

It seems Israelstan breeds insane people. It’s just one big insane asylum of people who think the whole world is out to get them, and then they do terrible things to Palestinians to turn those delusional fears into self-fulfilling prophecy.

Yes our Israelstan “delusional fears” are a lie.

Recent history has shown that everyone wants Israel to succeed and thrive, including Abraham;)

Israel at 50


Prelude to the Six Days


1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces


Ahmadinejad: Destroy Israel, End Crisis


Hezbollah’s unexpected firepower


Israel town anger at school attack


Abraham adds:

The way I see it, I OWN Israel and everything they have. And I want my stuff back.

If you don’t want your taxes going to Israel (or Eygpt), you’re free to live in Saudi Arabia, Lebanon or Syria. Just a suggestion.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

November 14th, 2007, 9:03 pm


59. abraham said:

If you don’t want your taxes going to Israel (or Eygpt), you’re free to live in Saudi Arabia, Lebanon or Syria. Just a suggestion.

What an expectedly idiotic reply. It’s easy for you to be so crass and cavalier from your bungalow in Brooklyn, isn’t it? Why don’t you move to Israelstan yourself since I’m paying for it?

[deleted by admin]

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

November 15th, 2007, 12:09 am


60. Akbar Palace said:

Why don’t you move to Israelstan yourself since I’m paying for it?


I’m content with the US, where my taxes go, and life in Brooklyn. I have spent years in beautiful Israelstan, and I plan to return many more times in the future. I guess what I’m saying is, I don’t feel like anyone owes me anything.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

November 15th, 2007, 11:56 am


Pages: « 1 [2] Show All

Post a comment