“Lebanese and Syrian Leaders as Seen by a Harvard Graduate Student,” by Kiernan

Here is part of the travel brief written up by a Harvard Middle East Studies grad student who traveled to Lebanon and Syria as part of a 30 person Harvard trip that was organized by some enterprising students at the Kennedy School of Government. During the preparation phase of the trip, I spoke with one of the organizers about the Syrian leg. Here is the account that Kieran sent to Colonel W. Patrick Lang who writes the excellent blog: Sic Semper Tyrannis. Col Lang is a retired senior officer of U.S. Military Intelligence and U.S. Army Special Forces. Here is part of the post, but read it all at Lang's blog.

Kieran sent me this letter account of his travels in the Levant some days ago and has today allowed me to post it.  pl

Johnharvardstatue7_4 "Recently I had the opportunity to travel as part of a student-organized delegation of 30 Harvard graduate students (mostly from the Kennedy School, though I'm at the Center for Middle East Studies) to Lebanon and Syria. We met with most of the major players, with whom we engaged in generally quite freewheeling debate. I imagine that the kind of discussions we had were quite rare simply because students have a certain freedom (and allow a certain freedom to the other party) that politicians, diplomats, journalists, and certainly citizens of the countries concerned do not. We were also there at a very historic time for Lebanon (May 19 – June 1), just after the Doha agreement. I thought you might be interested in hearing a few of my impressions……

A couple of days later we travelled to Damascus to meet Bashar al-Assad and his wife Asma in the visitors' palace on a mountain overlooking Damascus. Bashar spoke with us for three hours, all Q&A. He impressed the whole group with his willingness to actually answer the questions asked, his ability to provide logical defenses of his positions, his command of English, and his forward-looking mindset. A number of anti-Syrian Lebanese in the group walked away shaken by the experience. We were furthermore surprised that, in contrast to almost every other politician we met, we were not searched or put through any kind of physical screening. Only one (massive) bodyguard attended him and he seemed to be present more to pass the microphone around.

I asked him why he had not allowed the IAEA in to inspect the 'nuclear facility' in order to disprove US-Israeli allegations. He responded that there was no use – Saddam opened his sites up to inspectors but the US attacked anyway. He indicated that he does not believe in dignifying these kinds of allegations, or in setting the precedent of allowing weapons inspectors to run around his country. I told him I thought he underestimated the value of public relations – he was standing on a point of principle, but this would have real costs in terms of Syria's image in the media. He replied that he did not think so: the Western media would paint him as a bad guy in any case, and moreover in his view the key strategic decisions are taken without regard to public opinion (he again used the invasion of Iraq as an example).

Someone else asked him about his worst and best case scenarios for the region during the next 5 years. He said that the worst case scenario was a US or Israeli attack on Iran, which would have repercussions everywhere. The best case scenario was a US president committed to seeking peace accords with Syria and the Palestinians ("a genuine commitment, not like Annapolis"). I got the impression from this (and later from a sly 'yes we can' from his wife) that they saw a significant difference between Obama and McCain. Nonetheless, when explicitly asked about this, he replied that his country had learned to be skeptical of US campaign rhetoric.

As to the Syria-Israeli talks Assad said that the intention was genuine but that he doubted Olmert's ability to actually reach an agreement.

On Lebanon he was reluctant to discuss the details of Lebanese politics, though he was clearly pleased by the Doha agreement. He was ready to establish normal ties in principle (embassies and border demarcation) but sounded reluctant to do so with the government of Fuad al-Siniora. We (especially the Lebanese among us) pushed him hard on this issue, but it was not clear whether or not he appreciated the importance of Syria making a symbolic gesture of reconciliation. He considers Walid Jumblatt an enemy of the state.

The only point at which he became emotional was in discussing the regime's fight against Islamists during the early 80s, responding to a question about Hama. He talked about the various atrocities committed by the Islamists, then saying "what would you do with these people?"

When asked about Alawi dominance of key levers of power and the impact of that on political reform, he responded obliquely, talking about the new party law designed to end the Ba'ath Party's dominance of political life. When we pointed out that the problem was not just in the Party but in the military-security apparatus, his response became vaguer still. It was clear we were not getting anywhere on this issue.

Overall, Assad performed extremely well. Still, he could get off easy as the darker side of Syrian involvement in Lebanon is (somewhat) plausibly deniable. It struck me that one reason he may have consented to such an extended discussion in such a freewheeling format is practice for him in the hope of eventually making the transition to a more conventional or at least Western-style politician, giving press conferences and such.

After three hours his wife Asma showed up. If they were not in love it was a hell of a good act. After chatting informally for a bit and taking photos he left, and she sat in his place. She is beautiful, charming, and thoroughly English. She is also extremely intelligent and had a remarkable grasp of the minutiae of domestic social and economic policy that he himself did not exhibit. It occurred to me that a woman in her position may be in effect a second president. She discussed the importance of education as the key strategic domestic issue. She also mentioned that she was personally key in shaping the new companies law, which aims to shift the emphasis from the development of existing large enterprises to small and medium businesses, including startups.

After our return to Lebanon we met with Walid Jumblatt, who frankly appeared to be somewhat in pieces. In addition to a generally stoned demeanor, he gave answers which ranged from completely inscrutable to impolitically frank to obviously evasive. I tried hard to pin him down on the issue of the impact of US domestic politics on his 'bets' in Lebanon. After interrupting him about four times, steering him back to the issue from long lectures about nothing in particular, I asked him "do you think the US will trade Lebanon? [to Iran and Syria]" and got what I think was an honest "I don't know." He pushed what I find an implausible conspiracy theory of Syrian involvement in the death of Mughniyeh. His old dog lay loyally -or listlessly- at his feet the whole time. He said that Nasrallah and Hezbollah are fascist organizations and drew tired comparisons to 1930s Germany. His position towards the opposition was uncompromising, though I personally wouldn't be surprised to see him back as a Hezbollah ally in a few years if the US does not continue its strategy of confrontation in the Middle East. He was very pessimistic overall, though it was not clear if this was due to the broader strategic situation or the very humiliating defeat he had recently been handed by Hezbollah.

We met for two hours with Siniora, who seemed to be genuinely excited to see us but unfortunately proved to be very boring, lacking charisma or a sense of interactivity and choosing to lecture us about Lebanese history despite our protestations that we were familiar with it. He confirmed his technocrat image. In contrast to other March 14th figures he seemed quite optimistic and full of energy. He admitted that he personally had been against the two decisions that precipitated the crisis of the last few weeks, confirming reports that it had been Jumblatt behind them. Of all the orange juice served to us by the various figures we met, his was of the lowest quality.

We later met Saad Hariri at his Qoreitem palace, who, when I asked why he did not take the premiership, replied that he could do much more outside the government. He somewhat gauchely added, "Siniora is me!" When asked, he said that he did not believe the US would strike Iran, but that there would be a war perhaps 5 years hence, much bloodier than that which could be had now. Another question centered on his role in SecurePlus, a private security company that effectively constituted a militia, which was routed a few weeks ago. Saad admitted his connection to the company but denied that it was a militia. Saad had the demeanor of the playboy, lacking in finesse and genuine charisma, but full of confidence regardless. His orange juice was the highest quality. The security surrounding his palace was incredible, consisting of multiple checkpoints, barricades, and armed men everywhere. Pictures of Rafiq Hariri were displayed in abundance, including, as usual, in the central chair during the meeting.

Amin Gemayel was not particularly forthcoming, and seemed badly out of touch. When pressed for details on a number of points he was completely at a loss. He seemed to resort to stock politician phrases even in personal conversation. My impression was of a man losing vitality. I tried to push him on the question of what a real 'national defense strategy' would be, seeking some common ground between him and Hezbollah. He replied that he envisaged a 'Swiss model' of every citizen owning a gun. Incredulous, I asked him if that would really deter Israeli or Syrian aggression. He responded evasively, citing the importance of various UN resolutions. When I cornered him privately after the session, he said that in the 1970s they had tried to acquire Crotale air defense systems but were thwarted by Israeli pressure, indicating that similar factors were at play today.

Overall, none of the March 14th figures seemed to think there was any realistic prospect for Hezbollah's peaceful disarmament in the short to medium term. Geagea seemed to be the furthest from admitting this fact, while Jumblatt, Siniora, and Hariri were closest. Only Siniora and to some extent Hariri seemed upbeat about the Doha agreement, which struck me as odd considering that the agreement effectively redistributed seats from Sunnis to Shiites and Christians. This reinforced my feeling that the Doha agreement represented some kind of Saudi-Syrian reconciliation, considering Hariri's (and by extension Siniora's) very close ties to the Saudis.

The March 14th people unanimously condemned the actions of Hezbollah and its allies, and the phrase 'attempted coup' popped up repeatedly. Nonetheless, the general mood amongst the population was upbeat. There was broad satisfaction at the election of Michel Suleiman as President and the formation of a unity government. There was happiness too at the return of normal life to downtown Beirut, with the removal of the opposition protest camps. I had the feeling that Hezbollah and its allies could translate these developments into major political gains if they take the initiative to sustain political movement after a year and a half of paralysis. The upcoming elections in summer 2009 are the major political event towards which all the parties are working. 

We spent two days with Hezbollah. The first day involved being shown around the south by various low-level Hezbollah people. We were shown various scenes of Israeli atrocities (Qana, Khiyam) and presented with the families of martyrs at Bint Jbeil. The quality of the PR was exceptionally low and the propaganda exceedingly unsubtle, although our guide was a very lively and interesting woman with a show on Al-Manar. The reaction of our group was overwhelmingly negative, many feeling that the various tragedies and massacres were being very callously exploited.

The second day began with a tour of the Wa'ad rebuilding projects in the Dahiye. We were shocked by the speed and scale of the project – dozens of large residential buildings at various stages of construction, where last summer I saw only rubble. More than one person in our group contrasted the Hezbollah program with the US government's response to Katrina. People passing in cars and minibuses honked and cheered when they saw our group checking out the construction sites. [An aside to show just how out of touch the diplomatic community is: at a diplomatic party the night before a number of embassy people from various countries were assuring me that Hezbollah was not doing much construction.] Seeing the "Hezbollah stronghold" in person dispelled for many in the group the images the phrase conjures. There were no gunmen in the streets and many women walked around in tight jeans and revealing shirts. We met for several hours with Nawaf Musawi, Hezbollah's 'foreign minister' and a member of the politburo. He was very impressive – fiercely intelligent, an excellent debater, and a flexible thinker……

Comments (26)

annie said:

What a fantastic report !

June 4th, 2008, 3:58 am


EHSANI2 said:

Dr. Landis,

Thank you for posting this. The writing is informative, balanced, insightful and entertaining to read.

This must have been an excellent experience for the group.

June 4th, 2008, 4:07 am


Innocent_Criminal said:

wow! very interesting and i am so jealous of their trip. Its also interesting to see that to this guy’s account the Syrian president changed his mind about letting the IAEA inspectors in to check out the site.

I would also love to read opinions from others in his group to see if they really shared his view. Especially the anti-syrian lebanense ones.

I totally agree with his impression of HA propoganda machine which is tacky IMHO.

June 4th, 2008, 4:15 am


AnotherIsraeliGuy said:

If you read the parts not posted by Landis you will see that Hizballah are also expecting an attack on Iran and that they are saying that even in that case they may not attack Israel. That is good news for Lebanon.

June 4th, 2008, 4:28 am


majedkhaldoun said:

very interesting post, but I got the impression that Bashar has a superiority Complex, “Fawqiyeh”as far as syrians,may be the syrians look at him that he is above reproach.
the author must spend more time in the region.

June 4th, 2008, 4:36 am


why-discuss said:

Very sharp observations on these leaders, some are really funny. bravo!

June 4th, 2008, 6:17 am


MSK said:

Dear Josh,

This is a very interesting article but I don’t quite understand your choice of what you posted here and what you didn’t.

Unless you want to avoid both Geagea AND Hizbullah looking rather bad. 😉

On Jumblatt’s “defeat” during the “events” I find it funny that people still see it that way, as the Shuf was the only place where Hizbullah and its allies didn’t make much ground and had to retreat, with some of Talal Arslan’s people turning against their M8 allies. (And yes, I have this information from good sources, Nicolas Blanford and other reputable journalists, NOT the M14 propaganda machine ;))

On Duktuur Bashar: Nothing particularly new. His answer re: nuclear projects will have to be checked viz-a-viz the rules and regulations of the various nuclear treaties Syria has signed. Of course he is right in saying “The US attacked Iraq regardless of inspections” but that doesn’t mean that Syria could just breach int’l agreements.

(Insert long-winded caveat that US/Israel/bad-Western-imperialists breach treaties/UN-resolutions all the time etc.pp.)

I found Kieran’s observations of the Lebanese leaders most interesting. Geagea is scarred from 11 years in solitary confinement, gone 120% neo-con, and “spiritual”. Amin Gemayel is broken (well, his greatest hope, his son, did get assassinated). Seniora is a dull technocrat without any charisma whatsoever. Hariri is a Saudi playboy. Junblatt is a stoner.

This must really rile Nasrallah and Aoun: They can’t even beat such a motley crew of weak have-beens …

(Oh wait, I forgot that they use Alex’ strategy of sitting out crises and waiting until the tides turn.)



June 4th, 2008, 7:00 am


Alex said:

MSK said:

Amin Gemayel is broken (well, his greatest hope, his son, did get assassinated). Seniora is a dull technocrat without any charisma whatsoever. Hariri is a Saudi playboy. Junblatt is a stoner.

This must really rile Nasrallah and Aoun: They can’t even beat such a motley crew of weak have-beens …

Yaaaa MSK,

These are special characters .. but they are backed by a larger number of equally special characters.

June 4th, 2008, 8:12 am


MSK said:

Ya Alex,

Want me to post a pic of Hassuhum & Ahmadinejad? 😉

Oh wait … those are secret meetings, without any official pics.

And too bad there isn’t a pic of HN’s image prominently displayed in Duktur Bashar’s office, either, seeing how we are talking about “special characters”.

I don’t think there’s much difference in “specialty” of outside supporters.


PS: Did you read that Aoun’s going to Damascus? That’ll be interesting on the FPM fora …

June 4th, 2008, 10:05 am


Nour said:


Your information about the Chouf battles is laughable. I’m sorry but I know people on the ground in Choueifet and other areas in the Chouf; and the PSP was decisevely routed. No ifs, ands, or buts. There was a reason Jumblatt was so quick to turn everything over to Arslan, his longtime political and feudal foe. The PSP is trying to wage a propaganda campaign to salvage some sort of victory, but the information from the ground and the resulting political moves clearly show what really happened.

June 4th, 2008, 11:02 am


MSK said:


So we both have different accounts, then. I know people on the ground in the Shuf who said that HA took quite a beating and they DID loose 16 fighters.

As I pointed out before – I am not basing that on any party propaganda, but accounts of people who where there and int’l journalists who covered the events and have high ethical standards of reporting.


June 4th, 2008, 11:17 am


Qifa Nabki said:

This is great stuff. Kudos to Bashar for welcoming the kids, and it obviously clearly paid off. What wouldn’t I have done to be on such a trip!

June 4th, 2008, 11:30 am


Honest Patriot said:

QN, I thought you were on trip 😉

June 4th, 2008, 11:37 am


CuriousCanadian said:

Dear Professor Josh:
A wonderful post. These young people are the ones who can change the world.

June 4th, 2008, 12:28 pm


Nur al-Cubicle said:

Fascinating account. Hopefully these future leaders learned something. BTW, I read that, on purpose, Lebanon has refusing to conduct a census of its population since, get this, 1932.

June 4th, 2008, 2:53 pm


Alex said:

A Syrian American will be the president of the new super University (or the 10 billion dollar, soon to be 25 billion dollar) Science and Technology University in Saudi Arabia.

أميركي من اصل سوري رئيساً لجامعة الملك عبد الله المنتظرة
– 03/06/2008

وقع الاختيار على البروفيسور السوري الأميركي فواز العلبي ليشغل منصب العميد المؤسس لجامعة الملك عبد الله الجديدة للعلوم والتكنولوجيا، المتوقع أن تصبح سادس أكبر جامعة في العالم من حيث حجم المدخرات. ويشغل البروفيسور علبي الذي سيرأس الجامعة عندما تفتح أبوابها عام 2009، منصب نائب الرئيس في جامعة ميتشيغان في الولايات المتحدة الأميركية.
ويذكر أن الجامعة تلقت 10 بليون دولار كهبة مالية من الملك السعودي عبد الله جعلتها في المرتبة السادسة في العالم، فيما نقل مقربون مطلعون على عملية التفاوض الخاصة بالتمويل أن الهبات الممنوحة للجامعة ستنمو لتصل إلى 25 بليون دولار، الأمر الذي سيجعلها ثاني أكبر جامعة في العالم من حيث التمويل بعد جامعة هارفرد التي بلغت مدخراتها 35 بيليون دولار

June 4th, 2008, 3:22 pm


Alex said:

An American delegation that includes many Syrian Jews visited Aleppo and met with Syria’s grand Mufti and with a Syriac Bishop of Aleppo.

They visited many of Aleppo’s ancient synagogues as well as the homes and neighborhoods of their families.

President Assad will meet with them.

وفد أمريكي يضم يهوداً من أصل سوري يزور دمشق
– 03/06/2008

زار وفد أمريكي يضم يهوداً من أصل سوري الأراضي السورية أول أمس الأحد، وأجرى محادثات مع مفتي سوريا الشيخ الدكتور أحمد بدر الدين حسون في مدينة حلب، كما استقبلهم مطران طائفة السريان الأرثوذكس يوحنا إبراهيم في المدينة.
وتجول الوفد في الأماكن الأثرية والتاريخية وزار عدة كنِس يهودية، وتعرف إلى مناطق سكن آبائهم وأجدادهم في سوريا.
ويتوقع أن يلتقي الوفد عدة شخصيات على رأسها الرئيس السوري بشار الأسد.

June 4th, 2008, 3:25 pm


Alex said:

President Assad says he is not satisfied with political reforms in Syria. He has plans for a senate as well as plans to make it possible for “patriotic opposition” to participate…. opposition members who do not coordinate with outsides.

He explained that the difficult circumstances that Syria had to go through were mainly the reason for delaying political reforms.

الرئيس الأسد غير راض عن الإصلاح السياسي في سورية
– 03/06/2008

قال الرئيس بشار الأسد إنه غير راض عن الإصلاحات السياسية التي حدثت في بلاده وذلك كما نقلت عنه صحيفة الإمارات اليوم ،وبرر ذلك بما وصفه بالظروف التي تمر بها سورية، والتي عطلت المضي قدما في إحداث الإصلاح .
وكشف أثناء لقائه مع رؤساء تحرير الصحف في أبو ظبي حول الوضع الداخلي عن نيته إنشاء مجلس للشورى في سورية،مشيراً إلى أنه يتم الآن البحث في صيغته والاستفادة من تجارب دول عربية شقيقة في هذا الجانب
وأبدى ” الأسد ” استعداده لـ توسيع المشاركة السياسية، وضم «المعارضة الوطنية»، وقال “نعتبر المعارضة وطنية وايجابية ما لم ترتبط بالخارج” .
وأضاف إن سورية “حققت قفزات في النمو الاقتصادي بلغ 6,1 العام الماضي” ، وكشف النقاب عن وجود حزمة من القوانين الجديدة المتعلقة بالاستثمار وافتتاح عدد من البنوك الجديدة في سورية ، وقال نحن في طريقنا لافتتاح سوق للأسهم خلال عامين.
وأشار إلى أنه سيتم الإعلان عن إجراءات لدعم المؤسسات التشريعية والتنفيذية

June 4th, 2008, 3:31 pm


AnotherIsraeliGuy said:

Were they also taken to the nuclear sites? I think that is a little more important now.

June 4th, 2008, 3:31 pm


AnotherIsraeliGuy said:

How long are you going to be buying these excuses? “patriotic opposition”? Isn’t that an opposition that agrees with the government? Kilo is not supported by anyone outside, why is he in jail?

It is not for Asad to decide who is patriotic or not. It is Syrian people who should decide, and if they think a candidate is not “patriotic” they will not vote for him.

June 4th, 2008, 3:37 pm


Alex said:


You are always alert and focused.

But .. “a little more important”? … Why don’t you call it “the elephant in the room”?!

All this discussion here of the Harvard students who were highly impressed with the Syrian leader (and not with Israel’s friends in M14) is really ignoring AIPAC’s (new) elephant in the Room! … until the Hariri tribunal is useful again, AIPAC now is promoting “Syria’s failures to comply with the necessary inspections”

Let me take you back few years to a time when you guys tried really really hard to portray that other big elephant …


June 4th, 2008, 3:40 pm


AnotherIsraeliGuy said:

The Hariri tribunal is moving forward and the nuclear issue with Syria is moving forward and my point is that Asad letting Jews tour Aleppo is not going to change anything. If he wants to prove that something has changed let him return the remains of Eli Cohen to Israel. No big deal, just the remains of someone who is dead for 43 years already. What exactly is Syria gaining by keeping them? It would be a simple humanitarian gesture. But even this trivial act, Asad is not able to do which shows that all your PR is bogus.

June 4th, 2008, 3:49 pm


Alex said:

AnotherIsraeliGuy said:

How long are you going to be buying these excuses? “patriotic opposition”? Isn’t that an opposition that agrees with the government? Kilo is not supported by anyone outside, why is he in jail?

It is not for Asad to decide who is patriotic or not. It is Syrian people who should decide, and if they think a candidate is not “patriotic” they will not vote for him.

What you described is where things should be AT THE END of political reforms … or near the end of political reforms.

For now … I will “buy” any improvements we can have.

And I know that the first version of this new “senate” will likely not be very, very democratic.

June 4th, 2008, 3:50 pm


AnotherIsraeliGuy said:

But these are not improvements. They are just window dressing. All political reform starts with ONE thing. Freedom of speech. If that does not exist, then all the reforms are useless. Asad needs to allow a venue for public discourse in which people are guaranteed not to be thrown in jail or harrassed if they say something he doesn’t like. But there is ZERO move in that direction. So everything he does is just window dressing.

June 4th, 2008, 3:57 pm


Alex said:


Exactly .. the other “elephant in the room” is Syria’s failure to return the remains of Israel’s spy.

June 4th, 2008, 3:58 pm


AnotherIsraeliGuy said:

It is not an elephant in the room. It is a simple test of intentions. If the Syrians are so petty as to not be able to return the remains of a person dead 43 to his family in Israel, what do you want me to think of them? This is just an act of spite that doesn’t help Syria but just shows what the real Syria is like.

June 4th, 2008, 4:03 pm


Post a comment

Neoprofit AI beylikdüzü escort